AI Microscopy Platform

Control the hardware.
Own the data.
Automate the lab.

A precision adapter, an iPhone, and AI that controls how the image is captured — not just how it's read.
Semen analysis first, then across microscopy.

Clinical partner

CharitéUniversitätsmedizin Berlin

Funded by

Investitionsbank BerlinPro FIT, co-financed by EFRE

Problem

Microscopy diagnostics are
still done by hand.

Most morphology-based diagnostics still depend on a trained human at an eyepiece — which caps quality, capacity and access.

Subjective

The same sample yields different results depending on who reads it. There is no standardization across readers, and none across sites.

Personnel-bound

Every analysis needs a trained reader. Output depends on scarce staff being present, trained and available that day.

Throughput-capped

A reader can sign out only so many analyses per day — often a legal limit as well as a practical one. That is a hard ceiling on capacity.

And today's tools don't close the gap

Unaffordable for most practices

Dedicated analyzers and whole-slide scanners are priced for central labs, not for clinics and practices.

Not performant enough

CASA is weak on morphology. Passive AI scanners have no control over the images they are fed: variable focus, illumination and quality in, unreliable results out.

The category is still waiting for a tool that is both affordable and controls what the AI sees.

Approach

We don't just read the image.
We control how it's captured.

A precision adapter, an iPhone and AI on any existing light microscope. Active capture, not passive scanning.

Smartphone

Camera + iOS app

→

Adapter

Optical coupling

→

Microscope

Hardware you already own

→

AI engine

Detection and analysis

Active capture

A camera we control

The iPhone's 48MP computational sensor outresolves the 3.5–5MP cameras most practices use. More importantly, we drive focus, illumination and frame selection: the system decides what gets captured, rather than accepting whatever it is handed. That is the difference between active capture and passive scanning — and it is why the model sees a standardized image every time.

Quality gate

Refuses bad input

Frame quality is scored live, on the device. Poor input is refused rather than analyzed, and the technician is told exactly what to fix.

Data

Data we generate, not scrape

No public or purchased datasets. Our data comes from ethics-approved, SOP-managed clinical studies: standardized capture in, expert-annotated labels out.

Explainable

No black box

Every result is backed by annotated images — marked cells, traceable logic. Reviewers see exactly what the system saw, with a full audit trail.

Adoption

The barrier is a phone clip

A consumer-grade app running on hardware the lab already has. No new instrument to buy, install, learn or find bench space for.

On the bench

The system, running.

An iPhone on a precision adapter, clipped to a standard light microscope — and the analysis that comes out of it.

An iPhone mounted on a precision adapter attached to a standard Kern light microscope
The full rig: an iPhone and adapter on a standard Kern light microscope. No modification to the scope.
The analysis screen: a microscope field with each counted sperm cell boxed and numbered, above a concentration result of 24.9 million per millilitre
The analysis screen: every counted cell boxed and numbered, and the count behind the concentration correctable by hand.

First market

Why we start with
semen analysis.

Real, unignorable pain

Manual analysis takes 30–60 minutes per sample, is subjective, and is poorly standardized between readers and sites.

A market CASA validated but left open

CASA proved that clinics will automate this and pay for it. But it fails on morphology, so adoption stayed low. The demand exists; the need is unmet.

The most direct regulatory door

Semen analysis is IVDR Class B — a faster certification path than the Class C modules that follow it.

Per test, against the alternatives

MetricFertoManualCASA
Time per test~5 min30–60 min10–15 min
Cost per test~€15€30–60€30–35
Upfront cost~€1,000 (adapter + phone)—€10,000–30,000
MorphologyFull AI morphologySlow, subjectiveWeak

CASA cost per test includes roughly €15 of disposables. Ferto figures are planning estimates for the certified product, not measured pilot results.

Platform

A regulated greenfield, on
hardware labs already own.

Where certified tools exist, each one is locked to a dedicated analyzer or a whole-slide scanner in a central lab. None is point-of-care on a standard microscope, and none spans modules.

ModuleCertified todayBound toFerto
Semen analysisCASA: Hamilton Thorne, Microptic, LensHooke, SQA-VDedicated analyzer; weak on morphologyExisting scope, full morphology
Urine sedimentSysmex UF-5000, Beckman iQ200Central flow / imaging analyzerPoint-of-care classification
Urine cytologyNone certifiedManual expert reviewOpen whitespace
Pap / cervicalHologic Genius, BD, TechcyteThinPrep + imager, central labNo scanner, point-of-care
Effusion / FNACNone certifiedManual expert reviewOpen whitespace
HistologyPaige, Ibex GalenWhole-slide scanner + digital-path labExisting scope

Semen analysis is the module in development. Every other row is planned, not built — they describe where the platform extends, not what ships today.

The category and the regulatory path are already proven — by Hologic, Paige, Ibex and CASA. None of them removed the hardware barrier.

Roadmap

The path to Physical Lab AI.

Each certified module is also a data-generation step. The diagnostics business funds the dataset; the dataset trains the model; the model is what eventually runs the hardware.

Phase 1

Passive perception

2026–2028 · Under way

Deploy on tier-one clinical workflows and certify modules in parallel: semen, then urine, then cytology. Quality-gated capture at both ends generates the first structured, gold-standard microscopy dataset.

Output: labelled clinical data

Phase 2

Domain representation

2028–2030 · Planned

Once several modules reach data density, train a physics-grounded cytology foundation model — one that encodes cellular morphology through optical physics, focal depth and illumination, where general vision models fail.

Output: rich state embeddings

Phase 3

Embodied AI

2030–2033 · Planned

Map those embeddings to motor-control policies. A closed loop drives focus, illumination and stage, so the microscope runs itself — no operator at the eyepiece during analysis.

Output: autonomous analysis

Phase 1 is under way. Phases 2 and 3 are the plan, not built. Each phase is a real business on its own, and the prerequisite for the next.

Control the hardware. Own the data. Automate the lab.

Regulatory & IP

A dual path, already in motion.

Dual-market from day one

IVDR Class B for semen analysis, and FDA De Novo in parallel. Europe and the US on the same platform, rather than one after the other.

Certify once, then expand

A Predetermined Change Control Plan lets us add modules as controlled changes, without a full re-certification each time.

Reviewed, not theoretical

Our regulatory consultant and the Notified Body have both reviewed and confirmed the approach.

Intellectual property

Core system patent filed

Covering the AI gating mechanism and the inference pipeline. Counsel is actively prosecuting.

Freedom to operate reviewed

No blocking patents identified, with a clear design-around based on our own analysis and system IP.

Pilot programme

Run it in your lab, now.

For fertility clinics, sperm banks and andrology practices. The adapter clips to the microscope already on your bench — no new instrument, no installation, no service contract.

What you get

Adapter, app, support

A precision optical coupler for your existing eyepiece or trinocular port, the capture app, and calibration for your specific scope and objectives.

At the bench

Prepare, clip on, capture

Your existing sample prep, then roughly five minutes per sample. Frame quality is scored live, so if focus or illumination is off you are told what to fix before anything is analyzed.

What you see

Every cell, annotated

Each count comes with annotated images, so you can check what the system found against what you see down the eyepiece.

Research use only. Ferto is not CE-marked as an in-vitro diagnostic device and is not for use in diagnostic procedures — IVDR Class B certification is in progress. During the pilot, run it alongside your existing method rather than instead of it. What we're asking for is real-world use and your judgement on it, which is also what makes the certification data worth anything.

Where we are

Partnered, funded, filed.

Clinical partner

Charité Berlin

Performance study and data collection with Urology and the Kryobank, run under ethics-approved SOPs.

Funding

ProFIT-backed

Public innovation funding from Berlin, awarded to the Ferto–Charité consortium.

Pipeline

RUO pilots

Fertility clinics, sperm banks and andrology practices lined up as research-use pilot sites.

IP

Patent filed

Core system: AI gating and the inference pipeline. Freedom to operate reviewed.

Team

Built health-tech before.
Building the next.

The rest of the founding team

Co-Founder & CAIO
Computer vision and machine learning. Previously an AI data scientist across clinical diagnostics and digital health. Applied mathematics and computer science.
Co-Founder & CTO
Mobile systems and regulated medical software. Previously engineering lead at two health-tech companies.
Medical advisors
Two senior urologists, between them covering university-hospital practice, clinical trial design and digital health.

Full names and profiles go public shortly. In the meantime — ask us anything.

Contact

Get in touch.

Investors: tell us your focus and we'll send tailored materials on product, roadmap and execution. Clinics and labs: tell us your setup and we'll come back with what a pilot would look like.